February 1 Readings
Once again, I felt as though the suggestions for teaching presented in this week’s readings make learner easier for students and teachers. Perhaps I’m just looking for easier approaches. I like the idea of multigenre papers, largely because of the wide variety of material you would get to read as a teacher. The thought of reading the same papers over and over with merely slight variations is sickening. Not only would a multigenre paper essentially eliminate the tedious work of reading the same papers, it also gives the students choice in their learning (which in turn leads to increased motivation). Obviously Spandel believes that writers should have a choice in order to perform well and I am inclined to agree. A good way to get someone to hate writing is to make them write about things that they have no interest in or possibly even hate. It is important that students get to write on a topic of their choice, but perhaps more importantly, like a portfolio, they can choose to submit the work that they feel is their best. Multigenre papers can be seen as providing countless ways to engage students in their assignment. They are also useful for discovering your students’ interests on your way to being a caring teacher. Once you know what your students like, you can better cater future assignments to meet their needs.
Closely tied to student choice in assignments is relevance. What I liked most about the Williams chapter were the assignments (the examples of “good” assignments) that were relevant to the real lives of students – events that would have a direct affect on them. I also liked the way in which he emphasized the importance of building assignments off of each other and writing a new assignment in comparison to what the students had done on the previous assignments. I think as a busy teacher, it would be easy to take for granted that your students know the differences or similarities from one assignment to the next. I think it is a great idea to spend a sentence or two comparing and contrasting them as way to clarify and review. However, it is getting harder to take positive aspects away from Williams’s book. I question how much of his knowledge about students comes from personal experience and thus I question the credibility of his advice.
Here’s a website that has some interesting ideas for multigenre assignments based on grade level. There are also links for many more resources on multigenre assignments. http://www.ncte.org/profdev/online/ideas/freq/114026.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I concur wholeheartedly with your analysis of Williams. I think that so far his book has possed more questions than it has answers for our class. This is not too mention that his credibility is seriously undermined by his tone and his opinions of teaching.
I guess I was a little more hesitant with the idea of using multigenre work in the classroom. I like the idea that you bring up about providing choice and meaning for the students, but I wonder if in using multigenre projects we are in some way undermining the necessity of formal writing, a skill and talent that will be invaluable to students once they have ventured into the working world.
Just thoughts of mine, great post!
We all seem to have really similar sensibilities about the readings.
Post a Comment